Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3649 (JK)

RAVISUN ELECTRICALS TH RAVINDER KUMAR REKHI v. UT OF J AND K TH CHIEF SECRETARY AND OTHERS

WP(C)/3168/2026 · 2026-10-05

Shahzad Azeem

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP (C) No. 3168/2026 Ravisun Electricals, 43 Sec 5 GF Trikuta Nagar Jammu J&K 180020 Through its Partner Ravinder Kumar Rekhi. Date of pronouncement: 05.10.2026 Date of uploading: 05.10.2026 …..Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Divyanshu Malhotra, Advocate Vs 1. UT of J&K through The Chief Secretary R.No. 2/7, 2nd Floor Main Building, Civil Secretariat, Jammu-180001 2. The Commissioner (Additional Chief Secretary) Power Development Department UT of Jammu and Kashmir 3. The Managing Director Jammu Power Distribution Corporation Limited BR Ambedkar Chowk, Jammu, J&K-180006. 4. The Chief Engineer, Jammu Power Distribution Corporation Limited Canal Power House, Canal Road, Jammu J&K- 180002. 5. The Superintending Engineer, O&M Circle Jammu Power Distribution Corporation Limited Panama Chowk, Jammu, J&K- 180006. 6. The Executive Engineer Sub Transmission Div-1, Jammu Power Distribution Corporation Limited Behind Secretariat, Parade Jammu, J&K 180001. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE ORDER (ORAL) 05.10.2026 1. The short prayer made by the petitioner is that despite the petitioner having supplied the electric goods to the respondents (the functionaries of the Government) strictly in terms of the contract, they failed to honor the admitted dues/liability to the tune of Rs. 2,43,862/-. It is for this reason that the petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to the Sr. No. 6 2 WP(C) No. 3168/2026 respondents to release the due amount, which is admitted by the respondents. In order to substantiate its assertion, the petitioner has enclosed the reply to the RTI application dated 11.09.2025, furnished by the Superintending Engineer, O&M Circle, Jammu JPDCL. A perusal of the reply so furnished by the respondents/Superintending Engineer reveals that the respondents have already processed the claim of the petitioner for allotment of funds amounting to Rs. 2,43,862/-. 2. In view of the given facts and circumstances, once the respondents have admitted the liability that has arisen on account of performance of the contractual duty, it is the duty of the respondents to pay the outstanding admitted amount to the petitioner strictly in terms of its contractual obligation. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to pay the amount to the tune of Rs. 2,43,862/-, along with interest in terms of supply order and terms and conditions of such contract, as admissible under law after completion of codal formalities. Let this exercise be done within a period of four weeks from the date a copy of this order is made available to the respondents. 3. Disposed of, accordingly. (Shahzad Azeem) Judge Jammu 05.10.2026 Mihul Whether the order is reportable? Yes/No Whether the order is speaking? Yes/No Mihul Singh 2026.10.05 14:01