Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3649 (AP)

K PRASANNA v. DR GUNDEBOINA MURALIDHAR

CRLRC/1121/2023 · 2026-06-22

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation: ____________ Date of reserved for orders: Date of pronouncement: 23.06.2026 Date of uploading: APHC010599772023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1121/2023 Between: 1. K PRASANNA, W/O. GUNDEBOINA MURALIDHAR, FLAT. NO. 202, D-BLOCK, MS-9, SUMA ENCLAVE, NEAR MARUTHI HOME, JOHARAPURAM ROAD, KURNOOL DISTRICT, 518001, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. DR GUNDEBOINA MURALIDHAR, S/O G. SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O. PLOT NO. 102, ROAD NO.1, DHANA LAKSHMI CENTER, KPHB COLONY, HYDERABAD, AT PRESENT NIMS CASUAL MEDICAL OFFICER, NEAR PANJAGUTTA POLICE STATION, HYDERABAD. 2. GUNDEBOINA SUBBAIAH, TEACHER, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/O. KAMMAVARIPALLE VILLAGE, PORUMAMILLA MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 3. GUNDEBOYINA LAKSHUMMA, RETIRED TEACHER, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, KAMMAVARIPALLI VILLAGE, PORUMAMILLA MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 4. GUNDEBOINA CHALAPATHI, S/O. G. SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O. KAMMAVARIPALLI VILLAGE, POURMAMILLA MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 5. GUNDEBOINA SUBBAMMA, W/O. SREENIVASULU, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, GURRAMKONDA TOWN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, PUNGANURU, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. KADIRI RADHA, W/O. CHINNA LAKSHUMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, D.NO.2/411, DORASANIPALLI VILLAGE, PRODDATUR MANDAL, KADAPPA DISTRICT. 7. GUNDEBOINA SREENIVASULU, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, BSNL EMPLOYEE, TIRUPATI TOWN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 8. KADIRI CHENNA LAKSHUMIAH, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, D.NO.2/411, DORASANIPALLI, VILLAGE, PRODDATUR MANDAL, KADAPPA DISTRICT. 9. PULIVENDULA VENKATA SWAMY, S/O. NARASIMHULU AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, KAMMAVARIPALLE VILLAGE, PORUMAMILLA MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 10. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATI ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased topleased to set-aside the Judgment dated 17.11.2016 passed in SC. No. 331 of 2010 by the Assistant Sessions Judge, Proddatur which was confirmed by the Judgment dated 26-07-2023 passed in Crl. A. No. 05 of 2017 by the II Additional Sessions Judge, Kadapa and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to condone the delay of 22 days in filing the revision against the judgement passed by the II Additional Sessions Judge, Kadapa in Crl. A. No. 05 of 2017 dated 26.07.2023 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with the Certified copy of the order SC.No.331/2010 on the file of Assistant Sessions Judge, Proddatur dated 17.11.2016 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S V RUTHVIK Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO I.A.No.1 of 2023 in/and Crl.R.C.No.1121 of 2023 The Court made the following: ORDER: The Interlocutory application has been filed to condone the delay of 22 days in filing the revision against the judgment passed by the II Additional Sessions Judge, Kadapa in Crl.A.No.05 of 2017 dated 26.07.2023. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner and respondent Nos. 1 to 9. 3. In that view, since there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner and the respondent Nos. 1 to 9, this interlocutory application vide I.A. No.1 of 2023 is dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Revision Case shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 23.06.2026 JLSR Speaking  Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable  139 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO I.A.No.1 of 2023 in/and Crl.R.C.No.1121 of 2023 23.06.2026 JLSR