Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3647 (DEL)

VIJENDER v. ROBIN BALEJA, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (CEO), DELHI CANTONMENT BOARD AND ANR.

CONT.CAS(C)/656/2026 · 2026-04-20

Sachin Datta

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CONT.CAS(C) 656/2026 $~77 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision: 20.04.2026 VIJENDER .....Petitioner CONT.CAS(C) 656/2026 Through: Mr. Sanjay Beniwal, Ms. Manisha and Mr. R.K. Seewal, Advs. versus ROBIN BALEJA, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (CEO), DELHI CANTONMENT BOARD AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ankur Mishra and Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Adv. for R-1 (through v/c). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA SACHIN DATTA, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition alleges wilful disobedience of the directions contained in the order dated 16.12.2025, passed in W.P.(C) 19015/2025. The operative directions therein are as under: “2. In view of the aforesaid, we deem it appropriate to dispose of the present petition by directing respondent no.1/DCB to decide representations of petitioner dated 14th May 2025 [Annexure P-7] and 11th November 2025 [Annexure P-8], within a reasonable time and, in any case, within a period of 12 weeks from today.” 2. Learned counsel for the respondents, who appears on advance notice, submits that during a meeting of the Town Vending Committee (TVC) held on 17.04.2026, the representation of the petitioner was duly considered and a decision has been taken. 3. It is assured and undertaken that the same shall be communicated to the Digitally Signed By:UMANG Signing Date:28.04.2026 11:59:49 CONT.CAS(C) 656/2026 petitioner within a period of one week from today. 4. As such, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition. The same is, accordingly, disposed of. SACHIN DATTA, J APRIL 20, 2026/cl By:UMANG Signing Date:28.04.2026 11:59:49