IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44840 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-33 Year-2024 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Saharsa ====================================================== Roshan Kumar S/o Raj Kishore Sah R/o Chanakyapuri, Mira Talkies Road, Ward No. 31, PS-Saharsa, Distt.- Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amitabh Sohan For the State : Mr. Brajendra Nath Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3 10-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Amitabh Sohan and learned APP for the State. 2. This is the second attempt on behalf of the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Saharsa Cyber P.S. Case No. 33 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 406, 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120(B) IPC, 66, 66(C), 66(D) of the IT Act and ¾ of Public Gambling Act. 3. Earlier, the bail application of the petitioner has been rejected by this Court vide order dated 21.08.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 58287 of 2024, which reads as under: “Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Saharsa Cyber P.S. Case No. 33 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) of the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44840 of 2025(3) dt.10-02-2026 2/2 Indian Penal Code; Sections 66, 66© and 66(D) of the IT Act and Section 3/4 of the Public Gambling Act. 3. The petitioners and other criminals are alleged to have been involved in a cyber crime. During search different ATM cards and cheque books etc. have been recovered from them. The accused persons are members of cyber fraud gang. The petitioners are in jail since 13.05.2024. 4. Learned A.P.P. has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that sufficient material has come during investigation to connect the petitioners with the crime. 5. Considering the fact that petitioners are involved in cyber crime, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. 6. This application for regular bail is dismissed.” 4. The trial has been started. 5. Considering the above facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. priyanka/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T