Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 36431 (CAL)

AJAY KUMAR LAMBA v. SUDIP GHOSH @ KAJAL GHOSH AND ORS

CO/2852/2026 · 2026-08-27

Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. 6 (265719) 27.08.2026 (AD 27) (S. Banerjee) CO 2852 of 2026 Ajay Kumar Lamba Vs. Sudip Ghosh @ Kajal Ghosh & Ors. Mr. Subhajit Chowdhury Mr. Sujan Das Mr. Binay Shaw …for the petitioner This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the plaintiff praying for a direction upon the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Division) 1st Court at Alipore to dispose of Title Suit No. 2144 of 2024 expeditiously. From the order-sheets appended to this civil revision application this Court finds that application for injunction is still pending. In view of the order sought and proposed to be passed, there is no necessity to direct issuance of any notice upon the opposite parties. However, the learned advocate-on-record of the petitioner shall be obliged to forward a copy of this application along with a server copy of this order, upon the opposite parties or upon the learned advocate representing them before the learned trial judge forthwith. 2 In the light of the submission made by the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner this civil revision application stands disposed of by requesting the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Division) 1st Court at Alipore to take up the hearing of the injunction application on the next date fixed, if the same is otherwise ready for hearing and make an endeavour to dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. (Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)