Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3643 (BOM)

VAIKUNTH PANDEY v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ABA/1810/2026 · 2026-08-25

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

KVM 1/2 904 - ABA 1810 OF 2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1810 OF 2026 VAIKUNTH PANDEY ….. APPLICANT VS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ….. RESPONDENT ALONGWITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1488 OF 2026 VENUGOPAL @ KIRAN PRBHURAM JOSHI ….. APPLICANT VS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ….. RESPONDENT ALONGWITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1487 OF 2026 SANJAY PRABHURAM JOSHI ….. APPLICANT VS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ….. RESPONDENT ALONGWITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1751 OF 2026 ASLAM ADAM SORATHIA ….. APPLICANT VS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. ….. RESPONDENTS Adv. Vishwali V. Botle h/f. Adv. A. R. Gole for the Applicants. Mr. Ashok S. Gawai, APP for Respondent – State in ABA/1810/2026. Mr. Arfan Sait, APP for Respondent – State in ABA/1488/2026. Ms. Poonam P. Bhosale, APP for Respondent – State in ABA/1487/2026. Ms. Megha S. Bajoria, APP for Respondent – State in ABA/1751/2026. KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR Digitally signed by KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR Date: 2026.08.25 20:11:27 +0530 KVM 2/2 904 - ABA 1810 OF 2026.doc CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR , J. DATE : 25TH AUGUST, 2026. P.C. :- 1. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the FIR No. 123 of 2026, with respect to which the instant applications for anticipatory bail are filed, is already quashed by this Court by order dated 14th August, 2026 in Criminal Writ Petition No. 1650 of 2026 and in view of this, she states that the instant applications have become infructuous. 2) In view of this, all these applications are disposed of as infructuous. [PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.]