Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3642 (MAD)

Eeswaramurugan v. The State Rep By The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/6115/2026 · 2026-03-10

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 6115 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 6115 of 2026 Eeswaramurugan S/o. Velayudhapandiyan, Door No.9, Valliyammal Gardern Street, Rangarajapuram Kodampakkam. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep By The Inspector of Police CCB Police Station, Tambaram City, Cr.No.18/2026 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner/Accused on bail in Cr.No.18 of 2026 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s): G.Hariharan For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 05.02.2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 380 r/w. 34 of IPC [ sections 319, 318, 336, 338, 340, 305 r/w. 3(5) of https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 6115 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 BNS Act], in Crime No.18 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seek bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner had created a forged documents by impersonating the defacto complainant and sold the property to a third party in the year 2006. Hence, the present case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and that he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 05.02.2026 and is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed to grant bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police strongly opposed the grant of bail on the sole ground that the petitioner was arrested only on 05.02.2026 and the investigation is in the preliminary stage and it is a case of impersonation. Hence, he opposed to grant bail to the petitioner. 5.Considering the fact that it is a case of impersonation and that the investigation is in the nascent stage, this Court is of the view that it is not https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 6115 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 desirable to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this juncture. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 10-03-2026 MPA To 1.The Inspector of Police CCB Police Station, Tambaram City, Cr.No.18/2026 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 6115 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. MPA CRL OP No. 6115 of 2026 10-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis