Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 36414 (KAR)

SRI. U.M.SUBRAMANYA v. K.S.MANJUNATH

RFA/2366/2019 · 2026-08-20

Rajesh Rai K

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010551432019 NC: 2026:KHC:45886 RFA No. 2366 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 2366 OF 2019 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. U.M.SUBRAMANYA S/O MANJAPPAYYA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, 2. SMT. V.S GEETHA W/O U M SUBRAMANYA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, 3. U.S VIGNESHWARA S/O U.M SUBRAMANYA, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, 4. KUM. U.S SUSHMA D/O U.M SUBRAMANYA, AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS, APPELLANT NO. 4 IS MINOR, REPRESENTED BY HER FATHER NG I.E., APPELLANT NO.1, ALL ARE R/AT ULAVE, KAVADI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010551432019 NC: 2026:KHC:45886 RFA No. 2366 of 2019 SRINGERI TALUK-577139 CHICKMAGALUR DISTRICT. …APPELLANTS (BY SMT. DEEPIKA KESHAV, ADVOCATE FOR A2 -A4, SRI. Y. HARIPRASAD, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI. K.S.MANJUNATH S/O LATE SUBBANNA GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/AT KALKULI, KOCHAVALLI VILAGE, KASABA HOBLI, SRINGERI TALUK-577139 CHICKMAGALUR DISTRICT. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. N.K. RAMESH, ADVOCATE) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.03.2019 PASSED IN O.S.NO.40/2018 (O.S.NO.28/2017) ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, N.R.PURA ITINERATE AT SRINGERI, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010551432019 NC: 2026:KHC:45886 RFA No. 2366 of 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant files a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the above appeal since the dispute between the parties settled amicably out of Court. 2. Placing memo on record, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 3. Registry is directed to refund the Court fee as per law. SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE CR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 10