Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 36399 (CAL)

BENGAL SHRACHI HOUSING DEVELOPMENT LIMITED v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/26479/2024 · 2026-08-27

Anuj Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Item No.- 86 27.08.2026 Court No. 758 Rohan In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA 26479 of 2024 With I.A. No.: CAN 1 of 2024 I.A. No.: CAN 2 of 2024 Bengal Shrachi Housing Development Limited Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Sabyasachi Banerjee, Sr. Adv. Mr. Soumen Mohanty Mr. Ayan Poddar Mr. Syed Kishwar Ms. Priyanka Mukherjee Mr. Ayaan Hassan Ahmed … for the Petitioner Mr. Rajdeep Mazumder, Ld. AAG Mrs. Reshmi Ghosh Mr. Yuvraj Chatterjee … for the State 1. Mr. Sabyasachi Banerjeee, learned senior advocate appears for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Rajdeep Mazumder, learned Additional Advocate General appears for the State and files a report. 3. Mr. Mazumder submits that the instant writ petition was preferred by the petitioner inter alia praying for quashing Technocity Police Station Case No. 131 of 2024 dated 30th August, 2024 registered under Sections 115(2)/223/329/351(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 4. Mr. Mazumder further submits that the investigation into the aforesaid case has culminated into a charge- 2 sheet being Charge Sheet No. 196 of 2024 dated 30th November, 2024 under Sections 115(2)/223/329(3)/351(2)/3(5) of the BNS, 2023 against the accused person Nos. 2, 3 and 4. It is further submitted that the petitioner has not been sent up for trial as the materials disclosed during the investigation did not disclose sufficient incriminating materials warranting charge-sheet against the petitioner. 5. The report filed on behalf of the State is taken on record. Since the investigation has culminated in submission of charge-sheet and the petitioner has not been sent up for trial, the principal relief sought in the writ petition no longer survives for consideration. 6. Accordingly, WPA 26479 of 2024 alongwith CAN 1 of 2024 and CAN 2 of 2024 stands disposed of as infructuous. 7. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the investigation or on the case of the petitioner. 8. There will be no orders as to costs. 9. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 10. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Anuj Singh, J.)