Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3639 (MAD)

L.Somu, v. The Commissioner,

WP/13880/2026 · 2026-04-22

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 13880 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 13880 of 2026 and W.M.P. No.15110 of 2026 1. L.Somu 2. S.Mavatha ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation, Ripon Building, Chennai 600 001. 2. The Regional Deputy Commissioner (South), Greater Chennai Corporation, No.115, Dr.Muthulakshmi Salai, Adyar, Chennai 600 020. 3. The Assistant Engineer, Division No.178, Greater Chennai Corporation, Velachery Road, Velachery, Chennai 600 042. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER – This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioners’ applications for regularisation of the building __________ Page1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 13880 of 2026 approval vide application dated 05.08.2025 in Application No. 03/03125/2025 and 03/03126/2025, in respect of the properties in plot No.100, measuring to an extent of 70.81 square meters and Plot No. 100-A, measuring to an extent of 63.64 square meters respectively, situate at Anjugammal Street, Thanthai Periyar Nagar, Taramani, Chennai -600 113, and pass orders with in a stipulated time. For Petitioner(s): Mr.C.Prabakaran For Respondent(s): Mr.D.B.R.Prabhu, Standing Counsel (For R1 to R3) O R D E R W.M.P.No.15110 of 2026 filed seeking permission to the petitioners to join together and file a single writ petition is ordered on payment of separate court fee. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that an order has been passed on the petitioners’ application seeking approval of the regularisation of the building construction. Since the petitioners’ application has been returned unapproved by the Chennai Corporation through its order dated 29.08.2025, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks liberty for the petitioners to challenge the said order dated 29.08.2025, in the manner known to the petitioners under law. __________ Page2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 13880 of 2026 3.After recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Writ Petition is disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioners as prayed for. However, there shall be no order as to costs. 22-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No GSA To 1. The Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation, Ripon Building, Chennai 600 001. 2. The Regional Deputy Commissioner (South), Greater Chennai Corporation, No.115, Dr.Muthulakshmi Salai, Adyar, Chennai 600 020. 3. The Assistant Engineer, Division No.178, Greater Chennai Corporation, Velachery Road, Velachery, Chennai 600 042. __________ Page3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 13880 of 2026 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. GSA WP No. 13880 of 2026 22-04-2026 __________ Page4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis