28.8.2026 Ct. no. 21 SL. 14 Samarpita In the High Court at Calcutta Civil Revisional Jurisdiction Appellate Side CO/429/2026 PINAKI DEB @ PINAKI RANJAN DEB VS ANUPAMA DEB Mr. Soumya Basu Roy Chowdhury .. for the petitioner 1. The learned advocate representing the petitioner submits that petitioner does not intend to proceed with the present revisional application, and to that effect a letter has been furnished, let the letter be kept with the record. 2. As the petitioner does not intend to proceed with the present revisional application, the present revisional application is dismissed as not pressed. (Supratim Bhattacharya, J.)