Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation:__________
Date of reserved for orders : -- Date of pronouncement : 23.06.2026 Date of uploading
: APHC010310332023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3445/2023 Between:
1. DR. ANUPALLI APPARAO, S/O.SRI.LT.A.LAXMAIAH B.V.SC AND A.H .AGED 59 YEARS D.NO. S.F.NO. 1, PLOT NO. 31, SRISHIRIDI SAI VETERINARY COLONY OPPOSITE TO VIMS NEAR HANUMANTHAVAKA JUNCTION VISAKHAPATNAMASSISTANTDIRECTOR(AH) (SMILE) VISAKHAPATNAM
...PETITIONER AND
1. SRI GOPAL KRISHNA DWIVEDI, SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY ANIMAL HUSBANDARY ANDDAIRY DEVELOPMENT AND FISHERIES DEPT SECRETRIATE BUILDINGS AT VELAGAPUDI GUNTUR DISTRICT 522237 ANDHRA PRADESH
2. DR R AMERENDRA KUMAR, DIRECTOR OF ANIMAL HUSBANDARY DAIRY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PUNAMMATHOTA LABBIPET VIJAYAWADA ANDHRA PRADESH -520010
3. DR S CHAKRAVARTHY, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (AH) SMILE OLD DAIRYFARM CAMPUS NEAR HANUMANTHUVAKA JUNCTION - VISAKHAPATNAM 530043
2
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents herein under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against their willful and deliberate disobedience against the orders passed by Hon'ble Sri Justice TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO of this Hon'ble Court in in W.P.N0.12465/2.1dated 14June 2023 on the file of this Hon'ble court and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P LAKSHMANA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. G V S KISHORE KUMAR The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.3445 of 2023
ORDER:
This Court while disposing the Writ Petition No.12465 of 2021 directed the respondents to appoint the petitioner herein as Assistant Director SMILE in the place of 3rd respondent, as the 2nd respondent had violated the Rule and the law, as expeditiously as possible within 10 days from the date of receipt of copy of the
order in pursuant to the proceedings issued by the 1st respondent vide G.O.Ms.No.151, dated 17.06.2021.
2.
Learned counsel for respondents submits that against the orders of this Hon’ble Court, the respondents preferred letter patent appeal under clause 15 and the order in writ petition was set aside.
3. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, interlocutory applications, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 23.06.2026 SJ Whether the order is: Speaking √ Reasoned
Reportable
Non-reportable √
4
44 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
Contempt Case No.3445 of 2023
23.06.2026 SSJJ