IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39029 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-32 Year-2025 Thana- JOKIHAT District- Araria ====================================================== 1. Md. Akbar @ Akbar S/O Sharif R/O Vill.- Dhapi, Ward No. 8, P.S.- Jokihat, District- Araria 2. Md. Ashraf @ Ashraf S/O Sharif R/O Vill.- Dhapi, Ward No. 8, P.S.- Jokihat, District- Araria 3. Ajmal S/O Sharif R/O Vill.- Dhapi, Ward No. 8, P.S.- Jokihat, District- Araria 4. Sharif S/O Nafil @ Sheikh Nafiluddin @ Late Nafil R/O Vill.- Dhapi, Ward No. 8, P.S.- Jokihat, District- Araria ... ... Petitioner/s Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Md Naushaduzzoha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Mushtaque Alam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 6 17-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Jokihat P.S. Case No. 32 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 318(3), 318(4), 319(2), 352, 351(3), 3(5) of the B.N.S. 3. As per the prosecution case, the informant claimed ancestral land in Mauza Duba registered in her forefathers’ names and in her possession. She alleged the accused tried to grab it, trespassed on 5 January, 2025 with weapons, abused and threatened her and used a forged khatiyan, later declared fake by local authorities. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39029 of 2025(6) dt.17-02-2026 2/2 4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in this case. It is next submitted that petitioners and informant are agnates and there is land dispute between the parties and there is dispute with regard to the khatiyan. Petitioners have one criminal antecedent. 5. Learned counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P. for the State have jointly opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts, this application is allowed. 7. Let the petitioners, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the concerned Court below within four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Araria/ concerned Court below in connection with Jokihat P.S. Case No. 32 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 / Section 482 of the BNSS. tusharika/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T