Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 36350 (KAR)

SMT ZEENATHUNNISA v. SMT NOORJAN

RFA/910/2020 · 2026-08-20

Shivashankar Amarannavar

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010075232020 NC: 2026:KHC:45218 RFA No. 910 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 910 OF 2020 (DEC-) BETWEEN: SMT. ZEENATHUNNISA W/O SAFDAR HUSSAIN AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT NO.25, MODI ROAD BENGALURU-560045, REP BY HER G P A HOLDER MR. ARSHAD HUSSAIN. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. NARAYANA SWAMY V K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT NOORJAN SINCE DEAD BY HER LRS: SRI AMANULLA HUSBAND OF LATE NOORJAIN AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, 2. SRI. ASIF SON OF LATE NOOR JAN AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS 3. SMT YASMIN D/O LATE NOORJAN, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYANA MURTHY RAJASHRI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010075232020 NC: 2026:KHC:45218 RFA No. 910 of 2020 4. SRI SADDAM S/O LATE NOORJAN AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS 5. SMT. TAHSIN D/O LATE NOORJAN AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 6. SMT. HINA D/O LATE NOORJAN AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS 7. SMT GULNAZ D/O LATE NOORJAN AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT 1ST CROSS, MODI ROAD D J HALLI, BENGALURU-560045. …RESPONDENTS THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 18.10.2019, PASSED IN O.S.NO.8296/2004, ON THE FILE OF THE XXX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION, MANDATORY INJUNCTION AND MESNE PROFITS. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010075232020 NC: 2026:KHC:45218 RFA No. 910 of 2020 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeks time to take steps to bring the legal representatives of deceased sole appellant on record. 2. The death of the sole appellant has been intimated to the Court on 04.06.2025 by the learned counsel for the appellant. Even expiry of one year two months, learned counsel for the appellant has not taken steps to bring the legal representatives of deceased sole appellant on record. Hence, the appeal stands dismissed as abated. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE BK List No.: 3 Sl No.: 1