TANNIYAN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/9716/2026 · 2026-08-13
Vikram Aggarwal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 36348 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 36348 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
124
CRWP-9716-2026
Date of Decision: 13.08.2026
Tanniyan and another
…Petitioners
V/s State of Punjab and others
…Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL
Present: Mr. Mohan Singh Rana, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Ravinder Singh, DAG, Punjab.
*** VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J (ORAL)
The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondents No.4 and 5 and not to interfere and harass the petitioners and to direct the official respondents to ensure the security of life and liberty of the petitioners.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that they being majors have solemnized marriage with their own consent in accordance with law. However, the private respondents are not accepting the marriage of the petitioners and are extending threats to them. The copies of 'Aadhaar' card and Voter Card (Annexures P-1 and P-2) of petitioners No.1 and 2 have been placed on record.
3.
Notice of motion.
4.
Mr. Ravinder Singh, DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents.
5.
Without commenting upon the validity of the marriage, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the representation dated 10.08.2026 (Annexure P-5) and take requisite action, if so warranted, as per the facts and circumstances of the matter in accordance with law.
(VIKRAM AGGARWAL)
JUDGE August 13, 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No vcgarg
Whether reportable
: Yes/No
VIKAS CHANDER 2026.08.13 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document