1 CGHC010348352026 2026:CGHC:41253 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 8341 of 2026 • Saffar Ansari S/o. Mo. Basir Ansari, Aged About 28 Years Resident Of Jama, Post Charpa, Thana Madhupur, Distt. Deoghar, Jharkhand ... Applicant versus • State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer (S H O), Police Station Kansabel, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) ... Non-applicant For Applicant : Mr. Shubham Tripathi, Advocate For Non-Applicant : Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, Dy.G.A. Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 22.09.2026 1. This is the First bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 99/2025 registered at Police Station : Kansabel, District : Jashpur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 318(4), 319(2) and 317(4) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 66(D) of IT Act. 2 2. The prosecution story in brief is that complainant – Ramniwas Ram lodged an FIR on 08.08.2025 alleging that some unknown person has withdrawn Rs. 29,15,000/- without any authorization from the bank A/c of complainant, his wife and daughter. On the basis of complainant, police registered offence as stated above and arrested the applicant during the course of investigation. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that matter has already been settled between the applicant and the complainant and the afore-stated amount i.e. Rs. 29,15,000/- has already been refunded back to the complainant. He further submits that complainant has not supported the case of prosecution before the learned Court below. He prays to allow the instant bail application. 4. Learned State counsel endorses the submission made herein- above. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary. 6. Having considered the fact that the grabbed amount has already been refunded back to the complainant, who has not supported the case of prosecution before the learned Court below. Also considering the fact that applicant is languishing in jail since 27.01.2026, he has no previous criminal antecedents and the trial is likely to take sometime for its conclusion, I am of the opinion 3 that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case. 7. It is directed that in the event of the applicant executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 50,000/- to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court, he shall be released on bail on the following conditions:- (a) he shall make himself available for interrogation by the police officer as and when required; (b)he shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such fact to the Court; and (c) he shall not act in any manner which will be prejudicial to a fair and expeditious trial. The observation made hereinabove is for the purpose of deciding this bail application only, the learned trial Court shall decide the case on its own merits. - Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE A j i n k y a Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2026.09.22 18:25:23 +0530