DAVINDER KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/9733/2026 · 2026-08-13
Manisha Batra
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 36332 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 36332 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-9733-20 IN THE H (167 ) DAVINDER KA STATE OF PUN
CORAM: HON
Present: Mr.
Ms.
MANISHA BAT
1.
The the Constitution the official respo petitioners at the representation da
2.
It is they are major. T and threats have relatives to kill h petitioner No.2. representation da 2026 (O&M)
(1) HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AN CHANDIGARH
CR
Dat ER KAUR AND ANOTHER
Versus F PUNJAB AND OTHERS
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANI Mr. H.S. Sandhu, Advocate for the Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior DAG **** BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed tution of India seeking issuance of a w l respondents No.2 and 3 to protect at the hands of respondents No.4 to tion dated 09.08.2026 (Annexure P-4 It is submitted by the learned coun ajor. They are in love. Their parents ar have even been extended to petitione kill her. She has left her house and No.2. Apprehending danger to their l tion dated 09.08.2026 to the responden
AB AND HARYANA AT
CRWP-9733-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 13.08.2026 ... Petitioners
...Respondents MANISHA BATRA or the petitioners or DAG, Punjab n filed under Article 226/227 of of a writ of mandamus directing rotect the life and liberty of the to 7 and take action on their 4). d counsel for the petitioners that ents are against their relationship titioner No.1 by her parents and e and has started living with the their lives and liberty, they sent ondent No.2 but the same has AMIT SHARMA 2026.08.14 14:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
CRWP-9733-20 not been taken in
3.
Noti
4.
Ms behalf of respon
directed to supply
5.
I ha learned State co their relationship the veracity of th the sanctity of rel of with a directio District Tarn Tar dated 09.08.2026 necessary step, if found.
6.
It is petitioners from them.
13.08.2026 Amit Sharma
2026 (O&M)
(2) ken into consideration and hence, the p Notice of motion. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. DAG, espondents No.1 to 3, at this stage. T supply the copy of the petition to her. I have heard learned counsel for ate counsel and without going into t onship as well as without entering up y of the averments made in the petitio y of relationship or age of the petitione irection to the respondent No.2-Senior rn Taran to look into the matter and di 8.2026 (Annexure P-4) in accordance step, if any, genuine threat to life and It is made clear that this order shall from legal action for violation of l (MA
Whether speaking/reasoned:- Ye
e, the present petition. DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on tage. The petitioners’ counsel is to her. el for the petitioners as well as into the question of legality of ing upon an exercise to evaluate petition and also with regard to titioners, this petition is disposed Senior Superintendent of Police, and dispose of the representation dance with law and also to take e and liberty of the petitioners is r shall not be taken to protect the n of law, if any, committed by (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No AMIT SHARMA 2026.08.14 14:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.