Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 36324 (PAT)

REKHA KUMARI v. THE STATE OF BIHAR

CR. MISC./48346/2024 · 2026-01-09

Smt Soni Shrivastava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48346 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1029 Year-2023 Thana- SASARAM NAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== REKHA KUMARI D/O HARE RAM SAH R/O MOHALLA- BAULIYA ROAD, NOORGANJ, P.S- SASARAM TOWN, DISTT.- ROHTAS. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. UPENDRA KUMAR S/O RAJESHWAR SAH R/O VILLAGE- GHATIKAN, P.S- SHIVSAGAR, DISTT.- ROHTAS. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pravin Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Rajendra Nath Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 4 09-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP of the State. 2. The petitioner has filed the present application seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to opposite party no. 2 by the learned 1st Addl. Sessions Judge, Rohtas vide order dated 16.04.2024 passed in A.B.P. No.499 of 2024. 3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present application for cancellation of bail, with liberty to approach the Court concerned which had granted regular bail to opposite party no. 2, in case the said opposite party no. 2 further indulges in any act of making photographs of the petitioner viral on social Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48346 of 2024(4) dt.09-01-2026 2/2 media. 4. It is expected that the opposite party no.2 shall not create any disturbance in the peaceful life of the petitioner and in case opposite party no.2 further indulges in any act of making photographs of petitioner viral on social media, the petitioner would be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the opposite party no.2 before concerned Court which had granted bail to the opposite party no.2. 5. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the instant application stands disposed of. Harsh/- (Soni Shrivastava, J) U T