Kirankumar Vanmalida Panchasara v. The State of Maharashtra
REVN/170/2026 · 2026-08-21
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3630 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3630 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
50-REVN-170-2026 (CR).doc Tikam IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 170 OF 2026 Kirankumar Vanmalida Panchasara ...Applicant/s Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent/s _________________________________________________________________ Mr. Ajit Kenjale, Advocate for Applicant (thr. VC). Mr. M.G. Patil, APP for Respondent-State. _________________________________________________________________
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 21st AUGUST, 2026.
P.C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and learned APP.
2.
Learned counsel for the Applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this application with liberty to file appeal as provided under the MPID Act.
3.
Learned counsel for the Applicant submits that as revision application is filed within limitation and it is pending, hence, issue of limitation be condoned.
4. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the Application, leave is granted to withdraw the revision application with liberty to file appeal under the provisions of MPID Act. VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM Digitally signed by VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM Date: 2026.08.25 10:59:14 +0530
50-REVN-170-2026 (CR).doc Tikam
5. If appeal is filed, the Registry shall not raise issue of limitation as the revision application was pending.
6. Application is disposed of.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)