Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 363 (AP)

KOLA PULLAYYA v. UNION BANK OF INDIA

WP/6235/2026 · 2026-04-06

Lisa Gill, Ninala Jayasurya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010116912026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX WRIT PETITION No: 6235 of 2026 Between: KOLA PULLAYYA, S/o. LATE K. NARASIMHA RAO, DOOR NO. 4-37, PENUGONDA NAGAR, VEMAGIRI, NEAR COCO COLA FACTORY, KADIAM MANDALAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-533125. UNION BANK OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER, DANAVAIPETA BRANCH, D. MAIN ROAD, RAJAHMUNDRY CORAM:- HON’BLE Mrs. JUSTICE LISA GILL HON’BLE Mr.JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Present : None for petitioner Mrs.V.Dyumani, learned counsel for respondent. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX WRIT PETITION No: 6235 of 2026 KOLA PULLAYYA, S/o. LATE K. NARASIMHA RAO, AGE 78 YEARS, 37, PENUGONDA NAGAR, VEMAGIRI, NEAR COCO COLA FACTORY, KADIAM MANDALAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, 533125. ...PETITIONER AND UNION BANK OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER, DANAVAIPETA BRANCH, D. No. 46-7-17, DANAVAIPETA MAIN ROAD, RAJAHMUNDRY-533103. ...RESPONDENT s. JUSTICE LISA GILL Mr.JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA None for petitioner s.V.Dyumani, learned counsel for respondent. *** IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3575] AGE 78 YEARS, 37, PENUGONDA NAGAR, VEMAGIRI, NEAR COCO COLA FACTORY, KADIAM MANDALAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ...PETITIONER UNION BANK OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED- 17, DANAVAIPETA ...RESPONDENT W.P.No.6235 of 2026 -2- LISA GILL, J. This writ petition has been filed by a borrower challenging the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI) proceedings initiated in respect of property in question. Following order was passed on the last date of hearing. “In the interest of Justice, adjourned to 23.03.2026. If there is no representation for the petitioner on the next date of hearing, this writ petition may be dismissed for non- prosecution.” 2. Today again there is no representation on behalf of petitioner. It appears that he is not interested in pursuing the matter any longer. 3. Writ Petition is accordingly, dismissed in default and for non- prosecution. No costs. Consequently, pending Miscellaneous Applications, if any, are disposed of accordingly as well. (LISA GILL) JUDGE (NINALA JAYASURYA) JUDGE Date:07.04.2026 BLV W.P.No.6235 of 2026 -3- THE HON’BLE Mrs. JUSTICE LISA GILL THE HON’BLE Mr.JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION No: 6235 OF 2026 Date: 07.04.2026 BLV