09. 09. 24.08.2026 (D/L) (D/L) CT. NO. 05 CT. NO. 05 (ARPAN-A.R.CT.) In The High Court at Calcutta CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT Jurisdiction (Appellate Side) W.P.A. 20137 OF 2026 TUHINA PARVIN VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS …………… Mr. Awadeshi Kumar Rai, Adv. Ms. Sofia Naser, Adv. Mr. Santanu Sett, Adv. …For Petitioner Ms. Jayita Dhar Chakraborty, Adv. Mr. Joy Ranjan Dhar, Adv. …For State 1. Affidavit-of-service filed on behalf of petitioner is taken on record. 2. By presenting this writ petition an apprehension is expressed by petitioner that petitioner and her husband may be harassed by the concerned police authority while investigating Bagnan P.S. Case no.419 of 2026 dated 18th June, 2026 registered under certain provisions of BNS, 2023 and Arms Act. Petitioner prays for direction upon concerned police authority not to take steps against petitioner and her husband in connection with aforesaid criminal prosecution. Prayer is also made for informing particulars of criminal prosecutions pending against petitioner. 3. Learned advocate representing State respondents has filed a communication dated 14th August, 2026 of Inspector-in-Charge, Bagnan Police Station and same is taken on record. 4. It is disclosed in the communication dated 14th August, 2026 that one Prasanta Dey died on 17th June, 2026 in a clash which took place in front of [2] petitioner’s residence based on which aforesaid criminal prosecution was initiated. In connection therewith nine FIR named accused persons were arrested and some weapons were recovered from them. Subsequently, on 21st June, 2026 there was change of Investigating Officer. 5. From the communication it does not appear that petitioner or petitioner’s husband is FIR named person but it is disclosed that alleged incident took place in front of petitioner’s residence. 6. Since investigation is continuing, Court does not find it apt to restrain police authority to interrogate petitioner or her husband in connection with aforesaid criminal prosecution. It is expected that petitioner and her husband shall cooperate with the investigation. 7. Nothing is forthcoming that any criminal prosecution is pending against petitioner as on date from the said communication dated 14th August, 2026. 8. Hence, no further order need be passed on this writ petition. 9. Writ petition stands disposed of. 10. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. (SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA, J.)