Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3627 (UTT)

VINOD KUMAR BAHUGUNA v. RANJANA RAJGURU

CLCON/94/2026 · 2026-04-27

Alok Kumar Verma

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:3147 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 27TH APRIL, 2026 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.94 OF 2026 Vinod Kumar Bahuguna ..... Petitioner Versus Smt. Ranjana Rajguru ..…Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner : Ms. Anupriya Kukreti, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. J.S. Bisht, Advocate Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J. This Contempt Petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the Order dated 11.06.2025, passed in Writ Petition No.332 of 2021 (S/B), “Vinod Kumar Bahuguna vs. State of Uttarakhand and Another”. 2. Heard Ms. Anupriya Kukreti, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. J.S. Bisht, learned counsel for the respondent. 3. Smt. Ranjana Rajguru, the Secretary, Ayush and Ayush Education is present before this Court through video conferencing. 4. Ms. Anupriya Kukreti, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted on instructions that the Order dated 11.06.2025 has already been complied with. Therefore, the petitioner does not want to pursue the matter further. 1 2026:UHC:3147 5. In view of the above, this contempt petition (No.94 of 2026) does not require any further consideration. The proceedings in this contempt petition are closed. ___________________ ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J. Date: 27.04.2026 JKJ/Pant 2