Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 36251 (KAR)

SMT. SUREKHA PRAKASHAN v. LALITH V REDDY

RFA/1646/2026 · 2026-08-17

Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010554302026 NC: 2026:KHC:44088 RFA No. 1646 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1646 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SUREKHA PRAKASHAN, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, W/O V KRISHNA REDDY, R/AT NO.17, 2ND CROSS, 6TH ROAD, NANDIDURGA ROAD EXTENSION, BENSON TOWN, BENGALURU - 560 046 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. VISHNU HEGDE.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. LALITH V REDDY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, S/O LATE V KRISHNA REDDY, R/AT NO.118 FLAT NO.203, 2ND FLOOR, RMZ WOODS VALE, NANDIDURGA ROAD, BENSON TOWN, BENGALURU - 560 046 2. V RAJA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 47 EYARS, S/O LATE V KRISHNA REDDY, Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010554302026 NC: 2026:KHC:44088 RFA No. 1646 of 2026 R/AT NO.305 3RD FLOOR, SRI NILAYA APARTMENT, VIDYANAGAR, COOLONYPERURU, TIRUPATI CHITOOR (DISTRICT), ANDHRA PRADESH STATE - 517 502 3. V VIKRAM REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O LATE V KRISHNAR EDDY, R/AT VALLIVEDU VILLAGE AND POST, PAKALA (MANDAL) CHANDRAGIRI TALUK, CHITOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 517 152 …RESPONDENTS THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.04.2026 PASSED IN OS.NO.5580/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE XLII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR RESTORATION OF POSSESSION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010554302026 NC: 2026:KHC:44088 RFA No. 1646 of 2026 ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo requesting to convert this Regular First Appeal into a Civil Revision petition. 2. The memo is accepted. 3. The Regular First Appeal is converted as Civil Revision Petition. 4. Appeal memo is to be altered as Civil Revision Petition. Necessary alterations to be carried out. 5. The RFA is shown as disposed of for statistical purpose. Sd/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE SPV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10