Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 36238 (CHH)

MUZAFFAR KHAN (SINCE DEAD) v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCC/1194/2024 · 2026-09-15

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010425312024 2026:CGHC:40518 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 1194 of 2024 1 - Muzaffar Khan (Since Dead) 1.1 - (A) Razia Sultana W/o Mohd. Ayub Khan Aged About 57 Years R/o Main Road, Near Sbi, Bijapur, District Bijapur (Chhattisgarh) 1.2 - (B) Mohsina Begum W/o Mohammad Saleem Aged About 40 Years R/o Virindavan Colony, Mahendra Karma Ward, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (Chhattisgarh) 1.3 - (C) Mohd. Hussain S/o Late Muzaffar Khan Aged About 41 Years R/o Virindavan Colony, Mahendra Karma Ward, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (Chhattisgarh) 1.4 - (D) Mohd. Azhar Hussain S/o Late Muzaffar Khan Aged About 41 Years R/o Virindavan Colony, Mahendra Karma Ward, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (Chhattisgarh) 1.5 - (E) Aayesha Begum W/o Late Muzaffar Aged About 77 Years R/o Virindavan Colony, Mahendra Karma Ward, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (Chhattisgarh) (All Through Power of Attorney Holders) ... Applicants/Petitioners versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Post And P.S. Mandir Hasaud, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Sub Divisional Officer Revenue, Bijapur, District Bijapur (Chhattisgarh) 3 - Tahsildar, Bijapur, District Bijapur (Chhattisgarh) 4 - Abdul Zamil Khan S/o Ahmad Khan, R/o Bijapur/ Pratapganjpara, Jain Mandir Road, Jagdalpur, District Bastar Chhattisgarh Digitally signed by MOHAMMED AADIL KHAN Date: 2026.09.21 11:12:41 +0530 2 ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Applicants : Mr. Krishna Tandon, Advocate. For State : Mr. Rajkumar Sahu, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J. Order on Board 16-09-2026 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the applicants would submit that the grievance of the applicants has already been redressed and khasra number has already been corrected, therefore, the present petition has now become infructuous and he does not want to press the same. 2. On the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicants, the present MCC is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Aadil