Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11767 of 2018 ====================================================== Chhabila Ram Son of Late Rajdeo Ram, resident of Village- Anchha, P.S. Daudnagar, District- Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
2. The Principal Secretary, Land Revenue Department, Patna.
3. The Collector, Aurangabad.
4. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Aurangabad.
5. The Circle Officer, Daudnagar Circle, District- Aurangabad.
6. Birendra Kumar Singh, S/o Banshidhari Singh.
7. Uday Pratap Singh,
8. Ravindra Singh,
9. Yogendra Singh,
10. Anuj Kumar Singh. Respondent nos. 7 to 10 is sons of Rameshwar Singh.
11. Bachchu Lal Singh.
12. Jyotish Narayan Singh, Respondent nos. 11 and 12 is sons of Rameshwar Singh, null
13. Bageshwar Singh,
14. Surjit Singh @ Jhunjhun Singh, Respondent nos. 13 and 14 is sons of Ram Sewak Singh,
15. Ram Keshwar Ram, S/o Guru Charan Ram,
16. Ramadhar Ram, S/o Dular Ram,
17. Haridwar Ram, S/o Tikar Ram, Respondent nos. 6 to 17 are resident of Village- Anchha, P.S.- Daudnagar, District- Aurangabad. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None. For the Respondent/s : Mr.Dhurjati Kumar Prasad, GP-14 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 16-02-2026 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner though the State is present.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the
Patna High Court CWJC No.11767 of 2018(3) dt.16-02-2026 2/2 following relief/s: (i) to restore the possession of the land to the petitioner who is dispossessed from his land at the instance of private respondent no.6 to 17; (ii) the respondents be restrained from interfere with the agricultural land of the petitioner; (iii) for holding that the impugned non taking steps for non-restoring the possession of the petitioner's land to him is malafide, arbitrary and illegal as also falls within the teeth of direction of this Hon'ble Court.
3. For want of prosecution, the writ petition is dismissed.
Ravi/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U