Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 36231 (PAT)

The D. M. v. Sachidanand Singh

MA/353/2019 · 2026-02-05

Rajiv Roy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.353 of 2019 ====================================================== The D. M. United India Insurance Company Ltd. (A Govt. of India Undertaking Established in 1938), Muzaffarpur, appearing through the Manager and Authorized Signatory/Constituted Attorney of United India Insurance Company Limited, Regional Office, Hotel Chanakya Complex, R- Block, Patna ... ... Appellant/s Versus 1. Sachidanand Singh S/o Late Ram Julum Singh At and P.o. and P.s.- Kanti, Distt.- Muzaffarpur 2. Shyam Kishore Singh S/o Sri Indradeo Singh At - Sarai, Maner, Distt.- Patna-801108 ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Shailesh Anand, Advocate ; Mr. Harendra Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rajen Sahay, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 11 05-02-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present appeal has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s): “to set-aside the judgment dated 29.10.2018 & the award signed dated 06.11.18 by the Learned 11th Additional District Judge- Cum-M. V. A. Claim Tribunal, Muzaffarpur in Claim Case No. 108/2014 by virtue of which the learned Tribunal has wrongly awarded a compensation of Rs.11,83,200/- with interest @ 6% from the date of the filing of the case.” Patna High Court MA No.353 of 2019(11) dt.05-02-2026 2/2 3. Mr. Shailesh Anand, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the order stands complied and as such, he may be permitted to withdraw the appeal. 4. In that background, the appeal M.A. No. 353 of 2019 is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. The statutory amount if any, has to be returned. vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U