1 CGHC010087302021 2026:CGHC:40903 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 201 of 2021 1 - Dheeraj Dwivedi S/o Shiv Kumar Dwivedi, Aged About 45 Years R/o Padumnagar, Beside Hanuman Temple, Ward 17, Bhilai-3 Charoda Tehsil Paten, District Durg Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Chhattisgarh Vikash Grih Nirman Sahkari Samiti Maryadit Bhilai-3, Charoda, District Durg Chhattisgarh Regd. No./dr/drg/89 Dated 25/06/1983, Through Office Incharge, Deputy Registrar Office, Cooperative Societies Bunker Sangh Santarabari Durg Tehsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 2 - Chandrahas Pandey S/o J.L. Pandey, Aged About 50 Years R/o D-406, Maitri Nagar Raipur, Tehsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Durg Tehsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) WP227 No. 216 of 2021 2 1 - Pankaj Kumar Dwivedi S/o Shiv Kumar Dwivedi Aged About 40 Years R/o Padumnagar, Beside Hanuman Temple , Ward- 17, Bhilai 3 Charoda Tehsil Patan, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ---Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - Chhattisgarh Vikash Grih Nirman Sahkari Samiti Maryadit Bhilai 3, Charoda, District Durg Chhattisgarh Regd. No./dr/drg/89 Dated 25/06/1983 , Through Office Incharge, Deputy Registrar Office, Cooperative Societies Bunker Sangh Santarabari Durg, Tehsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 2 - Chandrahas Pandey S/o J.L. Pandey Aged About 50 Years R/o D- 406, Maitri Nagar Raipur, Tehsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Durg Tehsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Avinash Chand Sahu, Advocate For Respondent No.3/State : Mr. Ashutosh Trivedi, PL (Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Order on Board 18/09/2026 None appeared on behalf of the petitioners nor any representation is made on their behalf to pursue these petitions even after repeated calls. 3 Since no one appears and no representation is made on behalf of the petitioners, the present petitions stand dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge