Neutral Citation:__________ Date of reserved for orders : -- Date of pronouncement : 23.06.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010125082023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1698/2023 Between: 1. K SESAIAH, S/O. K.BALAIAH (LATE) AGE. 58 YEARS.OCC. SUPERINTENDENT (DISMISSED) RESIDENT OF . 5-11, PROFESSORS COLONY, NEAR T.V.TOWER, ANANTHAPURAM, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. M VENKATA LAKSHMAIAH, REGISTRAR, SRI KRISHNADEVARAYA UNIVERSITY, ANANTHAPURAM-515003. 2. K RAMA KRISHNA REDDY, VICE CHACELLOR, SRI KRISHNADEVARAYA UNIVERSITY, ANANTHAPURAM-515003. 3. SRI SYAMALA RAO IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION, A.P.SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to be pleased to summon and punish Respondents / contemnors under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Court Act for willfully and disability 2 and intentionally violating the orders passed by the Honourable High Court in W.P. No.14548/2022 dated 01.12.2022 under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt's of Courts Act in the interest of justice and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V RAMANA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. K V RAGHU VEER 2. M KARIBASAIAH(SC FOR SRI KRISHNA DEVARAYA UNIVERSITY) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.1698 of 2023 ORDER: When the matter is taken up for consideration, this Court find that there is no contempt in the present case. W.P.No.14548 of 2016, dated 01.12.2022 was disposed of by allowing the Writ Petition setting aside the impugned order and remand back to the Enquiry Authority to conduct enquiry as per the procedure of law by framing proper charge and calling explanation by following due procedure of law. On perusal of order in the writ petition, there is no such direction which requires for implementation; hence, the present Contempt Case is closed. 2. Accordingly, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, interlocutory applications, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 23.06.2026 SJ Whether the order is: Speaking √ Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable √ 4 99 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Contempt Case No.1698 of 2023 23.06.2026 SSJJ