Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 36206 (PAT)

Ram Nath Verma v. State Of Bihar and Anr

CR. MISC./5333/2018 · 2026-02-02

Sunil Dutta Mishra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5333 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-245 Year-1995 Thana- DANAPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Ram Nath Verma S/o Late Chakkha Mahto, R/o Village- Sherpur, P.S.- Maner, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. State of Bihar. 2. Shiv Kumar S/o Late Dhurendra Prasad, R/o Main Road, Bibiganj, P.S.- Danapur, District- Patna. At present R/o Flat No. 119 Harsita Meridian, J.P. Nagar, Bangalore. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Siddharth Prasad, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Meena Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 4 02-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The present Cr. Misc. Application has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing the order dated 19.09.2017 passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-VII, Danapur in Sessions Trial No.1040 of 1996 arising out of Danapur P.S. Case No.245 of 1995 by which the learned Court concerned had rejected the prayer of petitioner to reconstruct record admitting the photo copy of the supplementary case and the certified photo copy of the opinion of medical report with respect to the injury of injured/informant. 3. As per the report submitted by the learned Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5333 of 2018(4) dt.02-02-2026 2/2 A.C.J.M.-1, Danapur vide letter No.126 dated 29.10.2025, it is reported that the Sessions Trial No.1040 of 1996 arising out of Danapur P.S. Case No.245 of 1995 has already been disposed of as the petitioner has already been acquitted vide judgment dated 21.08.2025. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already been acquitted and this case has become infructuous, accordingly, prays that the present case may be disposed of. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has no objection to this prayer of the petitioner. 6. Considering the submissions of learned counsels for the parties and the report submitted by the concerned Court, the present Cr. Misc. Application stands disposed of having become infructuous. Ritik/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U T