SNEHALATA SAMANTA v. RANDHIR KUMAR, THE DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF PENSION AND ORS.
CPAN/51/2026 · 2026-03-06
Rajasekhar Mantha
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 362 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 362 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
06.03.2026 Court No.13 Item No.3 pk
CPAN 51 of 2026 In WPA 13219 of 2024
Snehalata Samanta Vs. Mr. Randhir Kumar and others
Mrs. Sabita Khutia (Bhunya),
Mr. Krishna Pada Santra, Ms. Arpita Saha ... For the applicant/petitioner.
Mr. Bhaskar Prasad Vaisya, Mr. Nilay Baran Mandal, Mr. Sagnik Bhattacharya … For the alleged contemnors.
1. It is submitted by the learned advocate for the petitioner that the order-in-question has been complied with. A copy of the Pension Payment Order issued in favour of the petitioner by the DPPG, West Bengal dated 26.02.2026 is taken on record.
2. In view of the above, nothing further remains to be adjudicated in the contempt petition.
3. Accordingly, the contempt petition being CPAN 51 of 2026 is disposed of. Rule, if any, shall stand discharged.
4. There will be no order as to costs.
5. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Rajasekhar Mantha, J.)
2