Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 36196 (CAL)

DEBNATH MUKHERJEE v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/2194/2026 · 2026-08-24

Partha Sarathi Chatterjee

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

24.08.2026 In The High Court at Calcutta Sl. No. 7 Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Court No. 446 Appellate Side Moumita CRM (A) 2194 of 2026 Debnath Mukherjee Vs. The State of West Bengal Mr. Lokesh Sharma, Adv. Mr. Tatini Sengupta, Adv. ….For the State 1. The petitioner is not represented. 2. Learned Advocate appearing for the State produces a memo of arrest and submits that, during the pendency of the present application for anticipatory bail, the petitioner has been arrested.The memo of arrest as placed is taken on record. 3. In view thereof, the application for anticipatory bail stands dismissed as infructuous. (Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.)