Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 36194 (PAT)

Nirmal Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors

CWJC/18969/2018 · 2026-02-09

Rajiv Roy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18969 of 2018 ====================================================== Nirmal Kumar Singh Son of Late Rameshwar Singh, Resident of Village- Enai, P.S.- Rivilganj, District- Saran at Chapra. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. The Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Commissioner, Saran Division, Saran at Chapra. 4. The District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra. 5. The Additional Collector, Saran at Chapra. 6. The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Saran at Chapra. 7. The Circle Officer, Sadar Chapra. 8. Md. Saifullah Rahmani, Revenue Karamchari, Mauza-Brahmpur, Circle Office- Chapra Sadar at Chapra. 9. Birendra Singh, Son of Late Gupta Singh, resident of Village- Chhota Brahmpur Masumganj, P.S.- Bhagwan Bazar, District- Saran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Binod Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Viveka Nand Singh, AC to GP-18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 09-02-2026 Heard Mr. Ram Binod Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): “(i) For issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of Land Possession Certificate issued by the Circle Officer, Sadar, Chapra withregard to 12 bighas, 01 katha and 15 Patna High Court CWJC No.18969 of 2018(3) dt.09-02-2026 2/4 dhurs of land bearing Thana No. 277, Jamabandi No. 401/513, Khesra No. 4297 and 4328 because it has been issued with regard to the land belonging to the Petitioner on the basis of antedated report dated 30-12-2016. (ii) For issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of the correction made in Register-2 of Jamabandi No. 401/513 whereby without any order passed by the Circle Officer, the Revenue Karamchari has entered Khata No. and Survey No. as well as father's name of Jamabandi holder in Register-2 on the basis of alleged order contained in Memo No. 191 dated 11-02-2017, (iii) For holding that the aforesaid correction in Register-2 with regard to Jamabandi No.401/513 has been effected by committing antedating in order to overcome the order of the Circle Officer dated 20-03-2017 whereby he had restrained any mutation over the land in question, had these entries been made in Register-2 on 11- 02-2017, it would have been reflected in subsequent certified copies of the Register-2 Patna High Court CWJC No.18969 of 2018(3) dt.09-02-2026 3/4 provided by the Circle Officer and LPC would not have been issued on 07-04-2017 with regard to entire 27 bighas, 14 kathas and 08 dhurs of land. (iv) For necessary direction upon the respondent authorities for conducting enquiry into the role of the Circle Officer, Sadar, Chapra, the Revenue Karamchari, Saifulla Rahmani and the concerned Clerk in the Circle Office, Sadar, Chapra, who have committed manipulation of records in order to favour the private respondent and further to take necessary action against the persons found responsible for such manipulation. (v) For restraining the respondents from making any mutation from Jamabandi No. 401/513 & 407/517 with regard to Khata No. 533, Survey No. 4297 and 4328 during the pendency of this writ application. (vi) For any other direction, which your Lordships may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 3. It has been informed by learned counsel for the petitioner that Title Suit No. 145 of 2016 and Title Suit No. 407 Patna High Court CWJC No.18969 of 2018(3) dt.09-02-2026 4/4 of 2016 now stand decided and in that background, the writ petition has become infructuous and as such, he may be permitted to withdraw the petition. 4. Permission accorded. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. Adnan/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U