27.08.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 244. Kausik (Allowed) CRM (M) 1410 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Haringhata Police Station Case No. 586 of 2024 dated 07.11.2024 under Sections 75/78/351(2)/3(5) of BNS and Section 12 of POCSO Act and Section 67/67A of IT Act. And In the matter of : Biswajit Kar ……Petitioner. Mr. Rajarshi Basu Mr. Subhrajyoti Ghosh ……for the Petitioner. Mr. Sayan Mukherjee ….for the defacto complainant. Mr. Gouranga Kumar Das, APP Mr. Amal Kumar Datta ….for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner was arrested on 9th November, 2024. Since then he is in custody. Although dates have been fixed but witness action has not commenced. State has produced the case diary. I have taken into account the statement of the victim under Section 183 of the BNSS. 2 Learned advocate for the defacto complainant opposes the prayer for bail. Having considered the materials appearing against the present petitioner, I am of the opinion that further detention is uncalled for. Petitioner be released on bail on stringent conditions. Accordingly prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Accordingly, Petitioner, namely, Biswajit Kar shall furnish bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of Learned ACJM, Krishnanagar, Nadia. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date fixed before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of District of Nadia without the prior permission of the learned Trial Court. Additionally, petitioner shall not enter the jurisdiction of Haringhata Police Station till the evidence of the vulnerable witnesses are over. Petitioner shall meet with the Officer-in-Charge of the local police station where he would reside. The address to that extent be furnished by the petitioner to the jurisdictional Court while accepting bond. Consequently, after accepting bond the 3 said jurisdictional Court will direct by naming the local police station where the petitioner would report. With the aforesaid observations CRM (M) 1410 of 2026 is allowed. Report and Memo of Evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)