Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 36170 (KAR)

SRI. RANGANATH M K v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/23577/2026 · 2026-08-17

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010519742026 NC: 2026:KHC:44294 WP No. 23577 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 23577 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. RANGANATH M.K. S/O KATAPPA @ BADLAYYA AGE 43 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O MENGASANDRA VILLAGE SRI RAMAPURA HOBLI, TQ-HOSADURGA, DIST-CHITRADURGA – 577 527 …PETITIONER (BY SMT. GIRIJA PATIL B., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU – 560 001. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, CHITRADURGA DIVISION, CHITRADURGA – 577 501 3. THE TAHSILDAR, HOSADURGA, TQ-HOSADURGA, DIST-CHITRADURGA – 577 527 Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010519742026 NC: 2026:KHC:44294 WP No. 23577 of 2026 4. THE SHERETHEDAR, HOSADURGA TAHASIL OFFICE, TQ- HOSADURGA DIST-CHITRADURGA – 577 527 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.P. RADHA, AGA FOR R1 TO R4)) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NOS.3 AND 4 TO CONSIDER REPRESENTATION VIDE ANNEXURE-N DATED 18-07-2026 FILED BY THE PETITIONER FOR ISSUING COPY OF MUTATION ORDER DATED 04-06-2016 BEARING NO. MRH.-17/2015-16. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned Addl.Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents. 2. In this petition, the petitioner has sought for direction to consider the representation dated 18.07.2026 (Annexure-N) by respondent-authorities. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010519742026 NC: 2026:KHC:44294 WP No. 23577 of 2026 3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on careful consideration of the representation at Annexure-N, would indicate that the mutation has been modified as per MRH.17/2015-16. 4. In that view of the matter, the petitioner is having an efficacious remedy to approach the competent authority under Section 136 (2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. 5. Needless to say that the respondent No.3 is hereby directed to, send a copy of the order in MRH.17/2015-16, to the petitioner through Registered Post Acknowledgement Due, within one month from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE BK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32