[2026:RJ-JP:16565] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6952/2026 Wasim Ahmad S/o Sri Sakhi Ahmad, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 10, Plot No. 18 Rajasthan Oil Mill, Ramganjmandi District Kota (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Senior Deputy Secretary, Revenue Group-7, State Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. District Collector, Jhalawar 3. Tehsildar, Tehsil Sunel District Jhalawar. 4. Land Settlement Officer, Civil Lines, Kota. 5. The Mining Engineer, Mines And Geology Department, Jhalawar. 6. Assistant Mining Engineer, Mines And Geology Department, Jhalawar. 7. Superintendent Mining Engineer, Mines And Geology Department, Kota Circle, Kota. 8. Additional Director (Mines), Kota Zone, Kota. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aniroodh Mathur with Mr. Krishnaveer Singh Mr. Naman Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. V.D. Gathala, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 20/04/2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:- “It is, therefore, most humbly and respectfully prayed that the writ petition may kindly be allowed and by issuing an appropriate writ, order or direction:- [2026:RJ-JP:16565] (2 of 3) [CW-6952/2026] i. to the District Collector Jhalawar to send check list and other requisite documents to Settlement Department, Kota without any delay and direct the Settlement Department, Kota to do the measurement of the khasras as instructed by the State Government by using DGPS in the presence of the Petitioner, Tehsildar Sunel & officials of the respondent mining department and ii. Grant such other relief/reliefs which in the facts and circumstances of this case this Hon’ble court deems just, fit and proper in favour of the Petitioner” 2. Mr. Aniroodh Mathur, Advocate along with Mr. Krishnaveer Singh, Advocate, at the very outset, submits that the relief sought in the present writ petition is confined to the issuance of directions to respondent No.4 – Land Settlement Officer, Civil Lines, Kota, to carry out the measurement of khasra numbers of the petitioner being khasra No.168 admeasuring 19 biswa, khasra No.169 admeasuring 1 bigha 10 biswa, khasra No.170 admeasuring 7 bigha 5 biswa and khasra No.171 admeasuring 10 bigha 4 biswa situated at Village Rooppura, Tehsil Pirawa, District Jhalawar, by respondent No.4 – Land Settlement Officer, Civil Lines, Kota, in a time bound manner, strictly in accordance with law, as despite several communications having already being made, no effective action has been taken thereon. 3. In furtherance of their submissions, learned counsel has referred to the communications dated 30.01.2026 (Annexure-22) and 03.02.2026 (Annexure-23). 4. Mr. V.D. Gathala, learned AGC puts in appearance on behalf of respondent Nos.3 and 4 and submits that in the event of directions being issued by this Court, the same would be complied [2026:RJ-JP:16565] (3 of 3) [CW-6952/2026] and the measurement of the aforementioned khasra numbers of the petitioner would be carried out within the stipulated time. 5. Taking note of the above and without delving into the merits of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh application before respondent Nos.2 and 4 within a period of ten days from today along with a certified copy of this order seeking measurement of his khasra numbers along with all the relevant documents in detail. In the event of any such application being filed by the petitioner, respondent Nos.2 and 4 are directed to decide the said application and carry out the necessary measurement of the aforementioned khasra numbers of the petitioner using Differential Global Positioning System (DGPS), strictly in accordance with and as permissible under the applicable law and rules, preferably in the presence of the petitioner after issuing a prior notice to him, within a period of six weeks thereafter. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. 6. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 7. Needless to say, this order has been passed only to decide the application of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law and in no manner be construed as a direction to decide the said application in a particular manner. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J ANMOL /11