Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 36163 (CAL)

NAJIR UDDIN MOLLA v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/2771/2026 · 2026-08-25

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

25.08.2026 Serial no. 75 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (A) 2771 of 2026 In re : An Application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023/under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with Minakhan PS Case No. 184 of 2026 dated 13.05.2026 u/s 329(3)/115(2)/117(2)/118(2)/109/74/351(2)/3(5) of the BNS. -And- In the matter of : Najir Uddin Molla … Petitioner(s) Ms. Sonali Das … for the petitioner(s) Mr. Amit Halder … for the State-respondent(s) Mr. Ali Ahsan Alamgir Ms. Soma Mal Ms. Rabia Khatoon Ms. June Modak … for the defacto-complainant(s) Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and charge-sheet has already been submitted. Therefore, learned advocate prays that the petitioner may be released on bail. Learned advocate for the defacto-complainant opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. State produces the case diary and draws the attention of the court to the injury report as well as the statement of the injured persons. 2 Having considered the overt acts in respect of which the petitioner’s name is appearing from the statement of the injured, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is Rejected. Accordingly, CRM (A) 2771 of 2026 is dismissed. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)