BIKRAM SAHOO @ BIKRAMJIT SAHOO v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
CRM (A)/2250/2026 · 2026-08-24
Partha Sarathi Chatterjee
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 36162 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 36162 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
28 24.08.2026 Ct. No 446 Jayanta Allowed
CRM (A) 2250 of 2026
In the matter of : BIKRAM SAHOO @ BIKRAMJIT SAHOO ….. petitioner
Adv. Y. Maity
…. For the Petitioner.
Adv. Kaustav Sharma Adv. H. Jaiswal
…. For the State.
1. Parties are present through their respective Counsels.
2. Mr. Maity, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner does not want to press this instant application.
3. In view of such submission made on behalf of the petitioner, the application for anticipatory bail stands dismissed as not pressed.
4. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, duly applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.)