Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 36160 (CAL)

RUMA ROY @ RUMA SINGHA v. APURBA SINGHA

CO/2592/2026 · 2026-08-25

Shampa Dutt Paul

Civil Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 1 25.08.2026 Item No.34 Court No. 30 g.b. CO 2592 of 2026 Smt. Ruma Roy @ Ruma Singha -vs- Sri Apurba Singha Mr. Dipayan Dan … For the Petitioner Mr. Indranuj Dutta Ms. Benazir Sk. …..For the Opposite Party 1. Affidavit of service filed be taken on record. 2. The revisional application has been preferred by the wife/petitioner praying for transfer of MAT Suit no. 81 of 2026 from the Court of the Learned Additional District Judge at Khatra, Bankura to the Court of Learned Additional District Judge (1st Court), Durgapur. 3. On hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the materials on record, it appears that the Matrimonial Suit has been filed in the Court of Learned Additional District Judge at Khatra, Bankura by the husband/opposite party herein. 2 2 4. The petitioner/wife herein resides at SS-9/2A NIT Campus, Durgapur MG Avenue, P. S. – Durgapur, District – Paschim Bardhaman, PIN 713209 with her minor child of 3 years. 5. Considering the difficulty of the petitioner/wife to travel to Bankura Court on regular basis, this Court relying upon the judgments of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in N.C.V. Aishwarya vs A.S. Saravana Karthik Sha, in Civil Appeal No(s). 4894 of 2022 (arising out of SLP (C) No(s). 16465 of 2021), decided on July 18, 2022, (Para 11, 12), directs that Matrimonial Suit No.81 of 2026 be withdrawn from the Court of Learned Additional District Judge at Khatra, Bankura and be transferred to the Court of Learned Additional District Judge(1st Court), Durgapur. 6. Learned Additional District Judge(1st Court), Durgapur shall proceed with the suit in accordance with law with due notice upon both the parties. 7. Keeping in mind the case of the opposite party herein, the learned Additional District Judge (1st Court), Durgapur shall be at liberty to permit the opposite party to appear virtually, if such prayer is made. 3 3 8. As no affidavits have been called for, the allegations made in the civil revision are denied. 9. CO 2592 of 2026 is disposed of. 10. Parties to act on the server copy of this order. 11. Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned Courts for immediate compliance. ( Shampa Dutt (Paul), J. )