Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 36154 (KAR)

SRI. VASANTH KUMAR v. SMT. MANJULA

RFA/1745/2019 · 2026-08-18

Vijaykumar A Patil

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010365002015 NC: 2026:KHC:45044 RFA No. 1087 of 2015 C/W RFA No. 1745 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.1087 OF 2015 (PAR) C/W REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.1745 OF 2019 (PAR & SP) IN RFA No.1087/2015: BETWEEN: 1. D.G. SAMPATH KUMAR S/O D.K. GOPALARAO AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS. 2. D.K. GOPAL RAO S/O LATE ANGADI KRISHNA RAO AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. BOTH ARE R/O "SANGEETHA NILAYA" DOOR NO.1675/234, SIDDARAMESHWARA BADAVANE, DAVANAGERE-577004. 3. R. BASAPPA S/O RAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/O BHAGATH SINGH NAGAR 12TH CROSS, NITUVALLI ROAD DAVANAGERE-577004. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. HARISH KUMAR M S, ADV.,) Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010365002015 NC: 2026:KHC:45044 RFA No. 1087 of 2015 C/W RFA No. 1745 of 2019 AND: 1. SMT. MANJULA D/O CHANNABASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O AVARAGERE VILLAGE, DAVANAGERE TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT. 2. SMT JALAJAKSHI D/O CHANNABASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O AVARAGERE VILLAGE, DAVANGERE TALUK, DAVANGERE DISTRICT. 3. CHANNABASAPPA S/O SIDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/O AVARAGERE VILLAGE, DAVANAGERE TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT. [ORDER DTD:03.01.2024, ACCORDINGLY RESPONDENT NOS.1, 2 & 4 TREATED AS LR’S] 4. RAVIKUMAR S/O CHANNABASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O AVARAGERE VILLAGE, DAVANAGERE TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.M. SIDDAPPA, ADV., FOR R1 & R2 R4 IS SERVED V/O/DTD:03.01.2024, R1, R2, & R4 ARE TREATED AS LR’S OF R3) - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010365002015 NC: 2026:KHC:45044 RFA No. 1087 of 2015 C/W RFA No. 1745 of 2019 THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 12.12.2014 PASSED IN OS.NO.3/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & CJM AT DAVANAGERE, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION. IN RFA NO.1745/2019: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. VASANTH KUMAR S/O B THIPPESWAMY AGED 45 YEARS R/O 625/5, RMC LINK ROAD BEHIND ARADHYA WIRES KSRTC LAYOUT, AVARAGERE DAVANAGERE-577002. 2. SMT LATHA BAI W/O K CHANDRA NAIK AGED 40 YEARS R/O NO.625/3, KSRTC LAYOUT AVARAGERE, DAVANAGERE-577002. 3. SMT G C GANGAMMA W/O G GURUMURTHY AGED 60 YEARS R/O NO.625/25, KSRCT LAYOUT, AVARAGERE DAVANAGERE-577002. ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI. HARISH KUMAR M.S. ADV.,) AND: 1. SMT. MANJULA D/O CHANNABASAPPA R/O AVARAGERE VILLAGE DAVANAGERE TALUK - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010365002015 NC: 2026:KHC:45044 RFA No. 1087 of 2015 C/W RFA No. 1745 of 2019 DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577002. 2. SMT JALAJAKSHI D/O CHANNABASAPPA AGED 40 YEARS R/O AVARAGERE VILLAGE DAVANAGERE TALUK DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577002. 3. CHANNABASAPPA S/O SIDDAPPA AGED 75 YEARS R/O AVARAGERE VILLAGE DAVANAGERE TALUK DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577002. [ORDER DTD:03.01.2024, ACCORDINGLY RESPONDENT NOS.1, 2 & 4 TREATED AS LR’S] 4. RAVIKUMAR S/O CHANNABASAPPA R/O AVARAGERE VILLAGE DAVANAGERE TALUK DAVANAGERE DISTRICT -577002. ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.M. SIDDAPPA, ADV., FOR R1 & R2 R4 SERVED) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 12.12.2014 PASSED IN OS.NO.3/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM., DAVANAGERE, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION. THESE APPEALS, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL - 5 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010365002015 NC: 2026:KHC:45044 RFA No. 1087 of 2015 C/W RFA No. 1745 of 2019 ORAL JUDGMENT In view of the judgment rendered by the Division Bench of this Court in WP.No.17588/2024 c/w WA.No.200260/2025 dated 08.07.2026, which is affirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SLP(C).No.025075/2026 dated 03.08.2026, the Registry is directed to take steps to transfer this appeal to the appropriate Court. 2. For statistical purposes, the appeal is disposed of. 3. All pending applications shall be considered by the transferee Court. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE ABK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 10