Sonali Mane 34-WP-9109-2026.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9109 OF 2026 Hermes Developers Thr. Its Partner Ketan Thakkar … Petitioner Versus State Of Maharashtra And Ors. … Respondents Adv. Vivek Kantawala a/w Adv. Vivek M. Sharma, Adv. Harsha Masand i/b Adv. Jash B. Vyas for Petitioner. Adv. Mamta S. Srivastava, AGP for Respondent No.1. Adv. Shon Gadgil a/w Adv. Murtaza Chherawala, Adv. Vidhi Khimavat, Adv. Asmita Mogre, Adv. Mihika Awahte i/b CNS Juris for Respondent No.2. CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 21 AUGUST, 2026 P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for parties. 2. The learned counsel for the Petitioner challenges the order dated 13 November, 2025 rejecting the Application at Exhibit 139 and 140 for rejection of the documents produced by the Respondents as being irrelevant. 1 / 2 MANE SONALI DILIP Digitally signed by MANE SONALI DILIP Date: 2026.08.25 14:59:04 +0530 Sonali Mane 34-WP-9109-2026.docx 3. It is the case of the Respondents that the documents filed in support of the defence are relevant to establish his defence. 4. Per contra, the learned counsel appearing for Petitioner submit that in a suit under Section 24, the documents particularly blue prints of floor plan of other properties are not relevant for the purpose of the present suit. 5. The Petitioner may raise these objections at the time when the evidence is lead and the Court concern would decide the same at the time of the evidence. 6. The Writ Petition is disposed of. [ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.] 2 / 2