CRM-M-34586 IN THE H (136) PARVEEN AND STATE OF HAR CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Mr. Mr. Ms. MANISHA BAT 1. The Bharatiya Nagar FIR No.345 date 191(3), 333 of 118(2) of BNS District Mahend on the basis of co 2. This parties to appear 4586-2026 (O&M) (1) HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AN CHANDIGARH CRM Dat N AND OTHERS Versus F HARYANA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANI Mr. Sachin Jangra, Advocate for the Mr. Ashok Kumar Khubbar, Addl. A Mr. Anurag Mor, Advocate and Ms. Hemlata, Advocate for responde **** BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been fil Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (for short 5 dated 10.11.2024 registered under 3 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 ( BNS added later on) at Police Stat ahendergarh and subsequent proceed s of compromise dated 30.04.2026 (An This Court vide order dated 01.0 ppear before the trial Court to get their AB AND HARYANA AT CRM-M-34586-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 21.08.2026 ... Petitioners ...Respondents MANISHA BATRA for the petitioners ddl. AG, Haryana spondents No.2 to 5 en filed under Section 528 of short “BNSS”) for quashing of under Sections 110, 115, 190, 2023 (for short “BNS”) (Section e Station Sadar Mahendergarh, roceedings emanating therefrom 26 (Annexure P-2). d 01.07.2026 had directed the et their statements recorded and AMIT SHARMA 2026.08.21 14:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-34586 the learned Magi of the compromis 3. Purs the learned Judi statements record Magistrate has s compromise has any coercion or u 4. Lear to 5 have not dis 5. In v continue with th Following the p Court in Kulwind 2007 (3) RCR ( Court in Gian S 303, this petition under Sections 1 2023 (for short “B 4586-2026 (O&M) (1) Magistrate was directed to send his r promise. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, par d Judicial Magistrate First Class, Mo recorded. On the basis of the statem has submitted report dated 07.08.20 se has been effected between the parti on or undue influence. Learned State counsel as well as cou not disputed the factum of compromise In view of the above, no useful pu ith the proceedings before the trial the principles laid down by the Ful lwinder Singh and others Versus Sta CR (Criminal) 1052 and approved an Singh Versus State of Punjab a etition is allowed and FIR No.345 da tions 110, 115, 190, 191(3), 333 of hort “BNS”) (Section 118(2) of BNS a d his report qua the genuineness er, parties have appeared before ss, Mohindergarh and got their statements so recorded, learned 7.08.2026 to the effect that the e parties voluntarily and without as counsel for respondents No.2 romise between the parties. ful purpose would be served to trial Court in the instant FIR. he Full Bench judgment of this s State of Punjab and another roved by the Hon’ble Supreme jab and others (2012) 10 SCC 345 dated 10.11.2024 registered 33 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, BNS added later on) at Police AMIT SHARMA 2026.08.21 14:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-34586 Station Sadar M proceedings ema 30.04.2026 (Ann 21.08.2026 Amit Sharma 4586-2026 (O&M) (3) adar Mahendergarh, District Mahen s emanating therefrom on the bas (Annexure P-2) are quashed qua the p (MA Whether speaking/reasoned:- Ye Mahendergarh and subsequent e basis of compromise dated a the petitioners. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No AMIT SHARMA 2026.08.21 14:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.