Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 36140 (CHH)

M/S PARAKH CONSTRUCTION v. PRINCIPAL ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL

WPT/160/2026 · 2026-09-16

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010342332026 2026:CGHC:40644 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPT No. 160 of 2026 1 - M/s Parakh Construction Through Proprietor, Shri Bhavesh Prakash And H U F (G S T I N -22 A A T H P 1180 R I Z I ) Rajkumar Bhansali, Infront Of B O Office Ravanbhatta, Nagri Dhamtari, C.G. 493778 ... Petitioner versus 1 - Principal Additional Director General Directorate General Of G S T Intelligence (D G G I ), Raipur Zonal Unit, 4th Floor, R I O Complex, Opposite Fruit Market, Lalpur, Raipur Chhattisgarh -492001. 2 - The Principal Commissioner, Central Goods And Service Tax ( C G S T ) And Central Excise, G S T Bhawan, Tikrapara, Dhamtari Road Raipur, Chhattisgarh -492001. 3 - The Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods And Service Tax ( C G S T ), Division - I V, G S T Bhawan, Tikrapara, Dhamtari Road Raipur, Chhattisgarh -492001. 4 - Senior Intelligence Officer, Directorate General Of G S T Intelligence (D G G I ), Raipur Zonal Unit, 4th Floor, R I O Complex, Opposite Fruit Market, Lalpur, Raipur , Chhattisgarh -492001. 5 - Additional Assistant Director, Directorate General Of G S T Intelligence (D G G I ), Raipur Zonal Unit, 4th Floor, R I O Complex, Opposite Fruit Market, Lalpur, Raipur Chhattisgarh -492001. 6 - The Principal Additional Director General , Directorate General Of G S T Intelligence (D G G I ), Raipur Zonal Unit, 4th Floor, R I O Complex, Opposite Fruit Market, Lalpur, Raipur Chhattisgarh -492001. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Arpit Parakh, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Maneesh Sharma, Advocate ARPAN SRIVASTAVA Digitally signed by ARPAN SRIVASTAVA Date: 2026.09.18 17:48:22 +0530 2 Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Justic e Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 17.09.2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file a duly constituted writ petition. 2. Prayer is allowed. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty, granted in favour of the petitioner. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Arpan