Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3614 (AP)

SHANKAR LAKSHMI DEVI BAI v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/16433/2026 · 2026-06-24

B S Bhanumathi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : - Date of pronouncement : 25.06.2026 Date of uploading : 01.07.2026 APHC010306102026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3311] Thursday, The 25th day of June, 2026 Present The Honourable Ms. Justice B. S. Bhanumathi Writ Petition No: 16433 of 2026 Between: Shankar Lakshmi Devi Bai ...Petitioner and The State of A.P. and others ...Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: 1. P. Narahari Babu Counsel for the respondents: 1. G.P. for Revenue The Court made the following: 2 BSB,J W.P.No.16433 of 2026 ORDER: The writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: “…to issue a writ, one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order questioning the action of the respondent No. 4 in not considering the representation made by the petitioner dated 20.03.2026 (through grievance) requesting to issue pattadar passbook and 1B Adangal in respect of land to an extent of Ac. 1.98 cents in Sy. No. 123-2 situated at Naginayanicheruvu Village, Somandepalli Mandal, Sri Sathya Sai District (erstwhile Anantapur District) though Village Revenue Officer submitted report stating that petitioner is in possession since 40 years as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and volatile of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondent No.4 to consider the representation through grievance made by the petitioner for issuance of pattadar passbook and to record her name in revenue records in respect of above mentioned property and pass…” 2. Sri G. Divyatheja, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, placed on record a copy of written instructions of the respondent No.4 vide Rc.No.204/2026/A, dated 17.06.2026, stating that the neither petitioner nor D. pattadar were in physical possession of the subject property. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested to dispose of the writ petition giving direction to the respondents concerned to pass a speaking order on the representation of the petitioner, as per law. 3 BSB,J W.P.No.16433 of 2026 4. Accordingly, considering the submissions made on both sides, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to pass a speaking order on the representation of the petitioner dated 20.03.2026, as per law. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE B.S. BHANUMATHI Dated: 25.06.2026 NSM Whether the order is: Speaking Recorded Reportable Non-reportable 4 BSB,J W.P.No.16433 of 2026 32 The Honourable Ms. Justice B.S.Bhanumathi Writ Petition No: 16433 of 2026 Dated: 25.06.2026 NSM