- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010393472021 NC: 2026:KHC:44776 RFA No. 1204 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1204 OF 2021 (EJE) BETWEEN: 1. L . THULASI, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, D/O LATE P. LAKSHMAN, W/O GANDIBAN, 2. L. BALASUNDARAM, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, S/O LATE P LAKSHMAN, 3. L. KALAIVANI, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, D/O LATE P. LAKSHMAN, 4. L. SRIDHAR, S/O LATE P. LAKSHMAN, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.1575, 2ND CROSS, NAGAPPA BLOCK, BENGALURU - 560 021. …APPELLANTS (BY SMT. CHAITHRA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. C.N. SATYANARAYANA SHASTRY., ADVOCATE) AND: ANJAN KARUNAKARAN @ K. DHANASHEKARAN, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, S/O LATE KARUNAKARAN, Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010393472021 NC: 2026:KHC:44776 RFA No. 1204 of 2021 RESIDING AT: SECOND FLOOR NO.373, 100 FT ROAD, INDIRANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 008. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. AJIT P B., ADVOCATE FOR C/R) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED:08.07.2021 PASSED IN OS.NO.26577/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE XXVI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE MAYO HALL, BENGALURU, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR EJECTMENT. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF ORAL JUDGMENT The daily order sheet of the appeal depicts that the appellants, on one or other grounds, are seeking time to advance arguments. 2. This appeal is filed challenging the Judgment and Decree dated 08.07.2021, whereby the Trial Court has directed the defendants to vacate and deliver the vacant possession of the suit schedule property to the plaintiff, within three months from the date of Judgment and Decree. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010393472021 NC: 2026:KHC:44776 RFA No. 1204 of 2021 3. The appeal though filed on 21.10.2021, the same is pending from five years. 4. Today, learned counsel Ms.Chaitra, appearing on behalf of Sri.C.N.Satyanarayana Shastry, learned counsel for the appellants submits that, the appellants are demanding 'No Objection Vakalath' to engage other counsel. 5. Appellant No.2 - L.Balasundaram, is present before the Court. 6. The conduct of the appellants show that, they are not interested in prosecuting the appeal and are only interested in dragging on the matter to avoid the Bench and nothing more. 7. In that view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE TKN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2 ct-vn