Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:5521
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.563 of 2026 ---- Ranchi Hessa, aged about 30 years Son of Sule Hessa, Resident of Village – Romaro, Baihatu, P.O.+P.S.- Tonto, District – West Singhbhum at Chaibasa.
…. …. Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) Versus
The State of Jharkhand
…. …. Opposite Party ----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ----
For the Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s)
: Mr. Birat Kumar, Adv.
For the State
: Mr. Sardhu Mahto, A.P.P.
----
02/Dated: 25th February, 2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the State.
2. The applicant who is in custody since 21.03.2025 has approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with S.T. Case No.195 of 2025 arising out of Tonto P.S. Case No.09 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 103(1) of the B.N.S., 2023, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, West Singhbhum at Chaibasa.
3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant(s) that complete set of FIR along with its enclosure have been annexed with this bail application and there is no suppression on his/her part.
4. Innocence has been claimed by the learned counsel for the applicant and undertaking has been given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted that that except confession there is no other material. On the above basis, prayer for bail has been made.
5.
Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the FIR and the weapon of crime has also been recovered. Further, out of eight charge-sheeted witnesses two witnesses have already been examined.
6. Considering the fact that there is witness to the incident and there is also recovery of weapon of crime, I am not inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the present bail application stands rejected.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.) Dated: 25th February, 2026 Amar/- Uploaded on 26.02.2026