Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3612 (AP)

MOPARTHI MARY ANANDHA VIJAYA KUMARI v. POTHARLANKA RAMESH

CRP/208/2023 · 2026-06-21

Subba Reddy Satti

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : --- Date of pronouncement : 22.06.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010005462023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] MONDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 208/2023 Between: 1. MOPARTHI MARY ANANDHA VIJAYA KUMARI, D/O M. PRAKASA RAO, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCCU- RETIRED EMPLOYEE, H. NO-19-15-3(7), TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. AT PRESENT RESIDING AT SRINAGAR, GUNTUR ...PETITIONER AND 1. POTHARLANKA RAMESH, S/o Subba rao, Aged about 46 years, Occu- Bussiness, R/o H. No-7-11-20/3, H/o Gadavati subbaiah, Opp. Thirupathamma Temple, Ganganama pet, Tenali, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased to petitioner presents this Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition before this Hon'ble Court against the order dt.05.11.2022 made in I.A.No.1187 of 2022 in O.S.No.481 of 2021 on the file of the COURT OF HONOURABLE PRL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, TENALI IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in O.S No. 481 of 2021 on the file of the court of Learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Tenali, pending disposal of the main CRP and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PAUL PRASAD ZAMPANI Counsel for the Respondent: 1. SIVA KUMARI SURINENI The Court made the following order : Since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter was listed 16.06.2026, the matter was directed to be listed today, under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. Despite the Civil Revision Petition being listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner either in the fornoon or in the afternoon. It seems the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the Civil Revision Petition. 3. Hence, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 22.06.2026 IKN Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Recorded Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No