EAST COAST GASES, v. THE ACCOUNTS OFFICER, KAKINADA & ANOTHER,
WP/27103/2009 · 2026-06-28
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3611 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3611 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010366622009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY, THE 29th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 27103/2009 Between:
1. EAST COAST GASES,, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR, MOOTHA GOWTAM, OFFICE NO.1, COSY WORLD RESTORS, NAGAMALLITHOTA JUNCTION, KAKINADA. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE ACCOUNTS OFFICER KAKINADA ANOTHER, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. THE A P EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD, OPERATIONS, RAJAHMUNDRY, REP. BY ITS SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction declaring the impugned action of the respondents in seeking to recover the 25% rebate sanctioned earlier to the petitioner firm without answering Petitioner's objections and in gross violation of the terms of the G.O.Ms.No. 108 Industries and Commerce (IP) Department dated 20-05- 1996, eventhough the petitioner possess the requisite eligibility criterial and when similar benefits were released by other departmetns, demanding recovery through 2nd respondent letter Lr.No.
2
SE(O)/Rjy/SAO:AO($)/JAO(LT)/D.No. 1346/09 dated 24-11-2009 as illegal, arbitrary and violatie of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondents not to recover the claim amount from the Petitioner firm by setting aside the same and grant such other just and consquential relief or relief IA NO: 1 OF 2009(WPMP 35290 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the Respondents not to disconnect the power supply as contemplated in 2nd respondent letter Lr.No. SE(O)/Rjy/SAO:AO($)/JAO(LT)/D.No. 1346/09 dated 24-11-2009 pending disposal fo the above Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2010(WVMP 2099 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders passed in WPMP No. 35290/2009 in WP No. 27103/2009 dt. 18-2-2010 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. BS KARTIK & PRASAD ESR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL)
2.
O MANOHER REDDY
3
The Court made the following ORAL ORDER:
On 23.06.2026 there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, this Court had directed the registry to list this matter under the caption for dismissal. Even today, none appears for the writ petitioner. 2. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. 3. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ______________________________________ JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
Date: 29.06.2026 MNR
Whether the order is :
Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No
Reportable Yes/No
4
101
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION No.27103 OF 2009
Dt: 29.06.2026 Mnr