Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 36108 (CAL)

UTTAM MONDAL @ UTTAM KR MONDAL @ UTTAM KUMAR MONDAL v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS

WPA/20347/2026 · 2026-08-25

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

15 2255..0088..22002266 Ct. No. 05 adeb WPA 20347 of 2026 Uttam Mondal @ Uttam Kr. Mondal @ Uttam Kumar Mondal Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Pradip Kundu Mr. Tapodip Gupta Mr. Golam Ahammed ….for the petitioner Mr. Sayan Chakravarty Mr. Apurba Ghosh …for the State 1. Affidavit of service filed on behalf of petitioner is taken on record. 2. Petitioner has obtained a decree in Title Suit No. 75 of 2016 which was put into execution. In connection with execution proceeding cost was deposited with the concerned police authority for deputing police personnel to carry out order of the Civil Court. It is submitted by learned advocate representing petitioner that in spite of depositing cost police personnel were not deputed. 3. State respondents are represented by learned advocate. 4. If after depositing cost police personnel are not deputed for carrying out order of Civil Court in that event petitioner shall be at liberty to bring 2 it to notice of the Civil Court in connection with execution proceeding. 5. With the aforesaid clarification present writ petition is disposed of. 6. Parties to act on server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)