27.08.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 246. Kausik (Allowed) CRM (M) 1421 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Ballygunge Police Station Case No. 75 dated 20.03.2026 under Sectioins 75(1)(iv)/79/356(2)/351(3) of BNS. And In the matter of : Tridib Majumder ……Petitioner. Mr. Sekhar Kumar Basu, Sr. Adv. Ms. Syed Khafiz Zamar ……for the Petitioner. Mr. Rudradipta Nandy Mr. Avik Ghatak Mr. Soham De Dhara ….for the defacto complainant. Dr. Pradip Banerjee, Ld. APP Ms. Priti Kar Bagchi ….for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits petitioner is in custody since 23rd May, 2026. Charge sheet has already been submitted before the jurisdictional Court. As such, petitioner prays for bail. Learned advocate for the defacto complainant submits that the present petitioner is circulating e-mail threatening the victim and also intimidating others. State has produced the case diary. 2 I have taken into account the materials appearing therein. Neither any certification under Section 65(4) of the Evidence Act is available nor any report of the expert is available in the case diary. Charge sheet has already been submitted before the jurisdictional Court. As such, I do not find any reason further to detain the petitioner. Having regard to the same, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, Petitioner, namely, Tridib Majumder shall furnish bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of Learned CJM, Alipore. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date fixed before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of Kolkata, North 24-Parganas and South 24-Parganas without the prior permission of the learned Trial Court. If the defacto complainant is faced with further inconveniences as has been submitted by the learned advocate appearing for the informant/defacto complainant, the same be brought to the notice of the learned CJM, Alipore/jurisdictional Court or to the concerned police station associated with the investigation. 3 The learned Magistrate will not deter for imposing further conditions upon the petitioner if the administration so demands. With the aforesaid observations CRM (M) 1421 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the records. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)