Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 36090 (CAL)

MITHUN TALUKDAR v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/20377/2026 · 2026-08-25

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1188 2255..0088..22002266 Ct. No. 5 adeb W.P.A. 20377 of 2026 Mithun Talukdar Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Shibaji Kumar Das Mr. Dipendu Sarkar …for the petitioner Ms. Ranjana Chatterjee Mr. Saikat Karmakar …for the State 1. Affidavit of service filed on behalf of petitioner is taken on record. 2. Learned advocate representing petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner is redressed. 3. State respondents are represented by learned advocate. 4. In view of such submission made on behalf of petitioner no further order need be passed on this writ petition and writ petition is disposed of. 5. Parties to act on server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)